SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1420

RAVI MALIMATH, PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
Geetarani Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
Yogesh Tiwari – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Praveen Dubey, Advocate, Anubhav Jain, Advocate, Yogesh Tiwari, Advocate, P.C.Tiwari, Advocate

JUDGMENT

PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. - This is wife's appeal under Sec. 19 of the Family Court's Act, 1984 against the judgment and decree dtd. 16/11/2010, passed by First Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhopal in RCS No. 166- A/2009, allowing husband's petition under Sec. 13 (1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1955), dissolving the marriage between the parties on the ground of cruelty.

2. Brief facts for adjudication of the present appeal are that the marriage between the parties was solemnized as per Hindu Rites and Customs on 13/6/2006 at Shiv Temple Hoshangabad Road, Bhopal. Soon after the marriage the relations between the parties had become strained which led the respondent to file a petition under Sec. 13(1) of the Act of 1955. The respondent-husband has stated that the appellantwife is a government servant. She is quarrelsome and stubborn lady. She used to abuse him and threatened to commit suicide. Her constant hostile, arrogant and provocative attitude had caused irreparable damage to his social status and personal life. Constant misunderstanding between them soured their relationship. On 1/7/2006, the respondent-husband w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top