SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1521

SANJAY DWIVEDI
Sanjeev Alias Kailash – Appellant
Versus
Shyam Manohar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ashish Shroti, Advocate, for the Appellant; Shri Imtiyaz Hussain, Advocate, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

1. This appeal has been filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure by the appellant/defendant against the judgment and decree dated 14.08.2006 passed in Civil Appeal No. 32-A/2006 arising out of the judgment and decree dated 24.12.2003 passed in Civil Suit No. 21-A/1997 whereby the appellate court has set aside the judgment and decree granted under Section 12(1)(a) of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 1961'), but, decreed the suit on the ground of Section 12(1)(c) of the Act of 1961.

2. The facts in brief are that the respondent No.1/Plaintiff filed a suit against the appellant/defendant and also against respondent Nos. 2 and 3 seeking decree of ejectment on the grounds that they were his tenants and not paid rent since October, 1994 and, therefore, they were in arrears of rent since October, 1994 to 1997 and further that they illegally constructed the toilet without consent of the respondent/plaintiff. The suit was registered as Civil Suit No. 21-A/1997 in the Court of Civil Judge Class II Seoni Malwa.

3. The plaintiff claimed himself to be the landlord of the house No. 4 situated at Ward No. 8, Seoni Malwa in which

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top