IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT GWALIOR
Satyendra Kumar Singh, J.
Ramesh Koli & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 4624 of 2023
Decided On : 06-04-2023
Suspension of Sentence - Bail - The court allowed the application for suspension of remaining jail sentence and granted bail to the appellants No.1 to 4, considering that they were on bail during trial, did not misuse the liberty granted to them, and the trial Court had already suspended the sentence till a specified date. The appellants were directed to be released on bail upon depositing the fine amount and furnishing personal bond and solvent surety.
Fact of the Case:
The trial Court convicted the appellants under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and sentenced them to imprisonment and fines. The appellants filed an application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail, arguing that the trial Court had not properly appreciated the evidence and that they did not misuse the liberty granted to them during the trial.
Finding of the Court:
The court allowed the application for suspension of remaining jail sentence and granted bail to the appellants No.1 to 4, considering that they were on bail during trial, did not misuse the liberty granted to them, and the trial Court had already suspended the sentence till a specified date.
Issues: Application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail filed on behalf of appellants No.1 to 4.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the fact that the appellants were on bail during trial, did not misuse the liberty granted to them, and the trial Court had already suspended the sentence till a specified date, and allowed the application for suspension of remaining jail sentence and granted bail.
Final Decision: The application for suspension of remaining jail sentence was allowed, and the appellants No.1 to 4 were directed to be released on bail upon depositing the fine amount and furnishing personal bond and solvent surety.
JUDGMENT
Satyendra Kumar Singh, J. - Heard on I.A.No.5893/2023, an application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail filed on behalf of appellants No.1 to 4.
2. The trial Court has convicted the appellant No.1 under Section 324 of IPC and sentenced to undergo six months' RI with fine of Rs.200/-, under Section 323/34 (two counts) of IPC and sentenced to undergo till rising of the court with fine of Rs.500/-, appellant No.2 has been convicted under Section 323 (two counts) of IPC and sentenced to undergo till rising of the court with fine of Rs.500/- and under Section 324/34 (two counts) of IPC and sentenced to undergo six months' RI with fine of Rs.200/-, appellant No.3 has been convicted under Section 323 (two counts) of IPC and sentenced to undergo till rising of the court with fine of Rs.500/- and under Section 324/34 of IPC and sentenced to undergo six months' RI with fine of Rs.200/- and appellant No.4 has been convicted under Section 323 (two counts) of IPC and sentenced to undergo till rising of the court with fine of Rs.500/- and under Section 324/34 of IPC and sentenced to undergo six months' RI with fine of Rs.200/-, in default to suffer further one week simple imprisonment, vide judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 24.03.2023 passed by First Additional Sessions Judge, Shivpuri to Additional Sessions Judge, Shivpuri in S.T.No.44/2018.
3. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the trial Court has not properly appreciated the evidence available on record. The appellants were on bail during trial and they have not misused the liberty granted to them. Learned trial Court has committed error in holding the appellants guilty for the aforesaid offences. The trial Court had already suspended their sentence till 23.04.2023. There is no likelihood of hearing of appeal in near future. In view of aforesaid, learned counsel for the appellants prays for suspension of remaining jail sentence and grant of the bail to the appellants.
4. Learned counsel for the respondent/State has opposed the prayer.
5. Heard learned counsel for both the parties.
6. Having considered the rival submissions, the appellants No. 1 to 4 were on bail during trial and they did not misuse the liberty granted to them, trial Court has already suspended the sentence till 23.04.2023, conclusion of the trial will take time, but without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the application is allowed and jail sentence of the appellants No.1 to 4 shall remain suspended.
7. It is directed that subject to depositing the fine amount, if already not deposited, appellants No.1 to 4 shall be released on bail on furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each along with separate solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court, for their appearance before the Registry of this Court firstly on 15.06.2023, and on such other dates, as may be fixed by the Registry in this regard, till final disposal of this appeal.
8. I.A.is allowed.
9. List for admission alongwith record.
10. C.C. as per rules.
The court has the discretion to suspend the remaining jail sentence and grant bail, considering the conduct of the appellants during the trial and the trial Court's decision to suspend the sentence.
The court has the discretion to suspend the jail sentence and grant bail to appellants pending appeal, considering the nature of the sentence and the likelihood of success in the appeal.
The court has the discretion to consider the period of sentence and previous bail status in allowing the suspension of remaining jail sentence and granting bail.
The court may consider the short nature of the sentence, the delay in the appeal process, and the potential for success in the appeal as grounds for suspending the jail sentence and granting bail.
The court has the discretion to suspend the jail sentence of the appellants under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C, considering the circumstances and conditions for the appellants' release on bail.
The court may exercise discretion to suspend a substantive sentence of imprisonment pending final disposal of an appeal, taking into account the detention period already served and the expected delay....
The court has the discretion to suspend the custodial part of a sentence under Section 389 of Cr.P.C, considering factors such as the likelihood of appeal hearing and the conduct of the appellants du....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.