IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Dinesh Kumar Paliwal, J.
Krishnakant & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 12621 of 2022
Decided On : 03-01-2023
Bail - Suspension of Sentence - The court allowed the application under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C. for suspension of sentence and grant of bail to the appellants, considering the short nature of the sentence and the fact that there is no possibility of hearing the appeal in the near future.
Fact of the Case:
The appellants were convicted for various offences under the IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment and pay fines. They applied for suspension of sentence and grant of bail, stating that they were on bail during the trial and had not misused the liberty granted. They argued that the trial court had not properly appreciated the evidence of the prosecution witnesses and that they had a fair chance to succeed in the appeal.
Finding of the Court:
The court, considering the short nature of the sentence and the unlikelihood of the appeal being heard in the near future, allowed the application and suspended the remaining jail sentence of the appellants. The appellants were directed to be released on bail upon depositing the fine amount and furnishing a personal bond with a solvent surety.
Issues: Application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C.
Ratio Decidendi: The court may suspend the execution of jail sentence if it considers the short nature of the sentence and the unlikelihood of the appeal being heard in the near future.
Final Decision: The court allowed the application, suspended the remaining jail sentence of the appellants, and directed their release on bail upon fulfilling certain conditions.
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Paliwal, J. - Heard on I.A. No.25404/2022, an application under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C. for suspension of sentence and grant of bail to appellants, pending the appeal.
2. Appellants have been convicted for commission of offence under Sections 323/34 (3 counts), 324/34, 325/34 (2 counts), 326/34 of IPC and have been sentenced to undergo R.I. for 3-3 months and fine of Rs.500-500/-, R. I. for 3 months and fine of Rs.500/-, R.I. for 1-1 year and fine of Rs.2000-2000/-and R.I. for 1 year and fine of Rs.2000/- each with default stipulations vide judgment dated 23.12.2022 passed in ST No.156/15 by 1st ASJ Gadarwara District Narsinghpur.
3. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that in the course of trial appellants were on bail. They have not misused the liberty granted by way of bail during trial. It is further submitted that a short sentence has been awarded by the trial Court and there is no possibility of hearing of this appeal in near future. It is further submitted that after conviction and passing of jail sentence, learned trial Court itself has suspended the jail sentence of the appellants till 20.01.2023. It is submitted that prosecution had not been successful before the trial Court to prove the case. Trial Court has not properly appreciated the evidence of the prosecution witnesses. Therefore, appellants have a fair chance to succeed in this appeal. Hence, it has been prayed that the execution of jail sentence of appellants be suspended and they be released on bail.
4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent/State has opposed the grant of bail to the appellants.
5. Having considered the short nature of sentence and the fact that there is no possibility of hearing of this appeal in near future, I am inclined to suspend the remaining jail sentence of the appellants.
6. Consequently, I.A. No.25404/2022 is allowed. The execution of jail sentence of appellants is hereby suspended subject to depositing the fine amount, if not already deposited. It is directed that the appellants be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond to a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) each with one solvent surety each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court with a further direction to appear before the trial Court on 12.05.2023 and also on such other dates, as may be fixed by that Court in this regard during the pendency of this appeal.
7. List this case for arguments on admission after receipt of record.
Certified copy as per rules.
The court has the discretion to suspend the jail sentence and grant bail to appellants pending appeal, considering the nature of the sentence and the likelihood of success in the appeal.
The court may consider the short nature of the sentence, the delay in the appeal process, and the potential for success in the appeal as grounds for suspending the jail sentence and granting bail.
The court has the discretion to suspend the remaining jail sentence and grant bail, considering the conduct of the appellants during the trial and the trial Court's decision to suspend the sentence.
The court has the discretion to suspend the jail sentence of the appellants under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C, considering the circumstances and conditions for the appellants' release on bail.
The court has the discretion to suspend a jail sentence based on the facts and circumstances of the case, and the likelihood of the final hearing of the appeal taking a sufficient long time.
The court may exercise discretion to suspend a substantive sentence of imprisonment pending final disposal of an appeal, taking into account the detention period already served and the expected delay....
The court has the discretion to suspend the custodial part of a sentence under Section 389 of Cr.P.C, considering factors such as the likelihood of appeal hearing and the conduct of the appellants du....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.