SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 576

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Dinesh Kumar Paliwal, J.
Krishnakant & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 12621 of 2022
Decided On : 03-01-2023

Advocates Appeared:
Shailendra Singh Thakur, Advocate, Nalini Gurung, Advocate

Headnote:

Bail - Suspension of Sentence - The court allowed the application under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C. for suspension of sentence and grant of bail to the appellants, considering the short nature of the sentence and the fact that there is no possibility of hearing the appeal in the near future.

Fact of the Case:

The appellants were convicted for various offences under the IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment and pay fines. They applied for suspension of sentence and grant of bail, stating that they were on bail during the trial and had not misused the liberty granted. They argued that the trial court had not properly appreciated the evidence of the prosecution witnesses and that they had a fair chance to succeed in the appeal.

Finding of the Court:

The court, considering the short nature of the sentence and the unlikelihood of the appeal being heard in the near future, allowed the application and suspended the remaining jail sentence of the appellants. The appellants were directed to be released on bail upon depositing the fine amount and furnishing a personal bond with a solvent surety.

Issues: Application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C.

Ratio Decidendi: The court may suspend the execution of jail sentence if it considers the short nature of the sentence and the unlikelihood of the appeal being heard in the near future.

Final Decision: The court allowed the application, suspended the remaining jail sentence of the appellants, and directed their release on bail upon fulfilling certain conditions.

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Paliwal, J. - Heard on I.A. No.25404/2022, an application under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C. for suspension of sentence and grant of bail to appellants, pending the appeal.

2. Appellants have been convicted for commission of offence under Sections 323/34 (3 counts), 324/34, 325/34 (2 counts), 326/34 of IPC and have been sentenced to undergo R.I. for 3-3 months and fine of Rs.500-500/-, R. I. for 3 months and fine of Rs.500/-, R.I. for 1-1 year and fine of Rs.2000-2000/-and R.I. for 1 year and fine of Rs.2000/- each with default stipulations vide judgment dated 23.12.2022 passed in ST No.156/15 by 1st ASJ Gadarwara District Narsinghpur.

3. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that in the course of trial appellants were on bail. They have not misused the liberty granted by way of bail during trial. It is further submitted that a short sentence has been awarded by the trial Court and there is no possibility of hearing of this appeal in near future. It is further submitted that after conviction and passing of jail sentence, learned trial Court itself has suspended the jail sentence of the appellants till 20.01.2023. It is submitted that prosecution had not been successful before the trial Court to prove the case. Trial Court has not properly appreciated the evidence of the prosecution witnesses. Therefore, appellants have a fair chance to succeed in this appeal. Hence, it has been prayed that the execution of jail sentence of appellants be suspended and they be released on bail.

4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent/State has opposed the grant of bail to the appellants.

5. Having considered the short nature of sentence and the fact that there is no possibility of hearing of this appeal in near future, I am inclined to suspend the remaining jail sentence of the appellants.

6. Consequently, I.A. No.25404/2022 is allowed. The execution of jail sentence of appellants is hereby suspended subject to depositing the fine amount, if not already deposited. It is directed that the appellants be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond to a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) each with one solvent surety each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court with a further direction to appear before the trial Court on 12.05.2023 and also on such other dates, as may be fixed by that Court in this regard during the pendency of this appeal.

7. List this case for arguments on admission after receipt of record.

Certified copy as per rules.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top