SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 772

PRANAY VERMA
Dinesh Joshi – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Shri Manu Maheshwari, Advocate, for the Appellant; Shri Koustubh Pathak, Govt. Advocate, for the Respondent.

ORDER

Heard on I.A No. 4510/2023 which is an application for condonation of delay in filing the revision.

For the reasons stated in the application the same is allowed and the delay in filing the revision is condoned.

1. This Revision under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 21.07.2022 passed by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, District Ujjain in Sessions Trial No.28/2022 whereby charge has been framed under Section 306 of the IPC against him.

2. The facts in short necessary for disposal of the present Revision are that Prashant Tiwari died due to hanging himself on 23.08.2021 at about 6.20 p.m.. He left behind a suicide note in which he stated that he had obtained certain loan from the petitioner who was pressurizing him for return of the same. Due to the pressure created upon him by the petitioner in demanding his money, he is committing suicide. Thereafter crime has been registered by Police Station Neelganga, District Ujjain for offence under Section 306 of the IPC. After investigation chargesheet has been filed and the same has been committed to the Court of Session after which the impugned order framing char

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top