SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 772

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT INDORE
Pranay Verma, J.
Dinesh Joshi – Appellant
Versus
The State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Criminal Revision No. 1370 of 2023
Decided On : 31-03-2023

Advocates Appeared:
Shri Manu Maheshwari, Advocate, for the Appellant; Shri Koustubh Pathak, Govt. Advocate, for the Respondent.

Demanding repayment of a loan does not necessarily amount to abetment of suicide under Section 306 of the IPC.

Headnote:

Abetment - Suicide - Section 306 of the IPC - [306, 107] - The court discussed the provisions of Section 306 of the IPC, defining abetment of suicide, and referred to relevant case laws to establish that demanding repayment of a loan does not necessarily amount to abetment of suicide. The court highlighted the legal principle that mere pressure to repay a loan does not constitute instigation or provocation for suicide, and quashed the charge framed under Section 306 of the IPC.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a Revision against the order framing charge under Section 306 of the IPC for abetment of suicide. The deceased committed suicide due to pressure to repay a loan advanced by the petitioner.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner's demand for loan repayment did not amount to abetment of suicide under Section 306 of the IPC.

Issues: Whether the petitioner's actions constituted abetment of suicide under Section 306 of the IPC.

Ratio Decidendi: The court established that demanding repayment of a loan does not necessarily amount to abetment of suicide, citing relevant case laws and legal provisions.

Final Decision: The court allowed the Revision and quashed the charge framed under Section 306 of the IPC against the petitioner.

ORDER

Heard on I.A No. 4510/2023 which is an application for condonation of delay in filing the revision.

For the reasons stated in the application the same is allowed and the delay in filing the revision is condoned.

1. This Revision under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 21.07.2022 passed by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, District Ujjain in Sessions Trial No.28/2022 whereby charge has been framed under Section 306 of the IPC against him.

2. The facts in short necessary for disposal of the present Revision are that Prashant Tiwari died due to hanging himself on 23.08.2021 at about 6.20 p.m.. He left behind a suicide note in which he stated that he had obtained certain loan from the petitioner who was pressurizing him for return of the same. Due to the pressure created upon him by the petitioner in demanding his money, he is committing suicide. Thereafter crime has been registered by Police Station Neelganga, District Ujjain for offence under Section 306 of the IPC. After investigation chargesheet has been filed and the same has been committed to the Court of Session after which the impugned order framing charge against the petitioner has been passed.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that loan was advanced to the deceased and as he did not repay the amount the petitioner insisted upon him for repayment of the same. For that purpose the petitioner exercised only that much pressure upon the deceased as was necessary for getting back the money. It cannot be said that the same amounted to any abetment or instigation on part of the petitioner for the deceased to commit suicide or that in view of acts of the petitioner the deceased had no other alternate but to commit suicide. It is further submitted that the allegations leveled against the petitioner even if taken to be true on their face value do not amount to any offence under Section 306 of the IPC.

4. Per contra learned counsel for the respondent/State has opposed the petition by referring to the incriminating statement made by the witnesses and submitted that the impugned order framing charge is well merited and does not warrant any interference.

5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have perused the record.

6. The question in the present case is whether considering and accepting the entire material available on record as absolutely correct, prima facie case for framing charge under Section 306 of the IPC is made out. It would be appropriate to refer to the provisions of Section 306 of the IPC which is as under :-

306. Abetment of suicide - A'If any person commits suicide, whoever abets the commission of such suicide, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.

7. It would also be apposite to refer to the definition of abetment as given under Section 107 of the IPC which is as under :-

    107. Abetment of a thing- A'A person abets the doing of a thing, who-

    First-Instigates any person to do that thing; or

    Secondly- Engages with one or more other person or persons in any conspiracy for the doing of that thing, if an act or illegal omission takes place in pursuance of that conspiracy, and in order to the doing of that thing; or

    Thirdly-Intentionally aids, by any act or illegal omission, the doing of that thing.

    Explanation 1- A person who, by wilful misrepresentation, or by wilful concealment of a material fact which he is bound to disclose, voluntarily causes or procures, or attempts to cause or procure, a thing to be done, is said to instigate the doing of that thing.

    Illustration

    A, a public officer, is authorised by a warrant from a Court of Justice to apprehend Z. B, knowing that fact and also that C is not Z, wilfully represents to A that C is Z, and thereby intentionally causes A to apprehend C. Here B abets by instigation the apprehension of C.

    Explanation 2-Whoever, either prior to or at the time of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top