SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 771

ANIL VERMA
Narendra – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sudeel Yadav, Advocate, Vishal Sanothiya, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

JUDGMENT

Anil Verma, J. - Applicant has filed this first bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. He is in jail since 27.5.2022 in connection with Crime No.18/2022 registered at P.S. - Kalukheda, Ratlam (M.P.) for commission of offence punishable under Section 420, 406/34 of IPC.

2. As per the prosecution story, on 4.1.2022 complainants lodged the written report at the police station by stating that the applicant Narendra Singh and co-accused Kailash have taken the tractor from the complainants for rental basis, but for last two years they have not paid the rent amount and also not returned the tractor to the complainant. On that basis police registered the complaint. During investigation the police arrested the co-accused persons and recovered the tractor, which is involved in the crime. On the basis of memorandum given by co- ccused under Section 27 of the Evidence Act the present applicant has been implicated in this offence.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant contended that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this offence. There is no legal evidence available on record to connect the applicant with the aforementioned offenc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top