SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1332

ANIL VERMA
Jafar – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Nilesh Dave, Advocate, Santosh Singh Thakur, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

JUDGMENT

Anil Verma, J. - This is the first bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed on behalf of the applicants for grant of bail. The applicants are in custody since 16.11.2022 in connection with Crime No.742/2022 registered at Police Station Dhamnod, District Dhar (M.P.) for commission of offence punishable under sections 420, 406 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code of 1860.

2. As per prosecution story, present applicant introduced co-accused to complainant Poonamchand. Thereafter co-accused purchased one truck bearing registration No. MH-18-AA-8099 in the year 2019. As per the terms of the agreement, co-accused Rajesh did not pay the installment of truck to the concerned bank. Thereafter complainant lodged an FIR at P.S. Dhamnod, district Dhar. Accordingly, offence has been registered.

3. Learned counsel for the applicants submit that the applicants are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this offence. They are in custody since 16.11.2022. Applicant Irfan's name has not mentioned in the FIR. Both the applicants are not purchaser of the said truck, even they are not attesting witnesses and they did not give any money to the comp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top