Back
SUNITA YADAV
Bhawna Jain – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Sunita Yadav, J. - The applicant has filed this First application u/S 439, Cr.P.C. for grant of bail.
2. The applicant has been arrested by Police Station Radhogarh, District Guna in connection with Crime No. 402 of 2022 registered for the offence punishable under Section 360/34 of IPC.
3. The allegation against the present applicant-accused is that he instigated deceased-Trilok Sahu to commit suicide due to which he committed suicide by
4. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that applicant is an innocent person and has been falsely implicated. She is a widow having two children and one of her child is living with her in jail. There is no ingredients of abetment in the present case. The applicant is in custody since 27/02/2023 and is having no criminal history. The applicant is permanent resident of District Gwalior. Conclusion of trial is likely to take time and there is no likelihood of his absconsion, if released on bail. On these grounds, he prays for grant of bail to the applicant.
5. Per contra, application is opposed by learned counsel for the State as well as Counsel for the complainant by submitting that in view of the gravity of the offence, the applicant should
The decision to grant bail was based on the overall facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, and emphasized the need for compliance with specifie....
Grant of bail based on changed circumstances and parity with co-accused, without expressing opinion on merits of the case.
The court has the discretion to grant bail based on the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.
The court may grant bail based on factors such as the status of co-accused and the expected duration of the trial, without commenting on the merits of the case.
The court considered the compromise between the parties, the affidavit from the deceased's father, and the similarity to a co-accused who was granted anticipatory bail as influential factors in grant....
The court may grant bail based on factors such as lack of support from the victim, the age of the victim, and the likelihood of the trial taking time.
The court's decision was based on the applicant's entitlement to bail under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, considering the facts and circumstances of the case.
The court has the discretion to grant bail based on the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.
The court may grant bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C based on factors such as lack of criminal history and readiness to abide by specified conditions, without commenting on the merits of the case.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
