SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 747

ANJULI PALO
Suresh Chhabra – Appellant
Versus
Mahindra Mahindra Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ms. Namrata K. Agrawal, Advocate, for the Appellant.

ORDER

1. In this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioner has challenged the direction issued in the order dated 30.01.2023 by learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Damoh in Criminal Appeal No.08.2023 whereby lower appellate Court has directed the petitioner along with co-accused person to pay 20% of the sum i.e. Rs.1,60,79,750/- within a period of sixty days as a condition for suspension of sentence.

2. In this case the trial Court vide judgment dated 26.12.2022, convicted the petitioner and co-accused person for offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced them for R for 1 year and to pay a sum of Rs.1,60,79,750 - to the complainant.

3. The petitioner along with co-accused filed an appeal before the lower appellate Court wherein an application under Section 389 of the Cr.P.C. was filed. The lower appellate Court while deciding the aforesaid application vide impugned order dated 30.01.2023 suspended the sentence imposed on the accused person subject to the condition that in view of Section 148 of the NI Act, the accused persons shall deposit 20% of the amount in question within sixty days.

4. On the question

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top