SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 498

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT INDORE
Pranay Verma, J.
Firoz Khan & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
Indore Municipal Corporation & Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 4465 of 2023
Decided On : 20-02-2023

Advocates Appeared:
Tousif Warsi, Advocate, Amol Shrivastava, Advocate
Final Result : Disposed Of

Due process, opportunity of hearing, prohibition on construction

Headnote:

Constitution of India - Article 226 - Unconstitutional Demolition

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners sought relief from the court to declare the act of not issuing show cause notice and announcing demolition in a specific area as unconstitutional, and to direct the respondents to follow the prescribed procedure by law and not to carry out any demolition against economically weaker sections of society.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the respondents to issue notices to the petitioners and afford them an opportunity of hearing before passing the final order. It also prohibited coercive steps against the petitioners until the final order is passed and restrained the petitioners from carrying out any construction over the disputed property until a final decision is made. The petition was disposed of without expressing any opinion on merits.

Issues: Unconstitutional demolition, show cause notice, opportunity of hearing, construction prohibition

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of following due process by issuing notices and providing an opportunity of hearing before taking any coercive steps against the petitioners. It also highlighted the need to refrain from carrying out any construction over the disputed property until a final decision is made.

Final Decision: The petition was disposed of without expressing any opinion on merits.

JUDGMENT

Pranay Verma, J. - By this petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs :-

    " It is, therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to declare the act of respondents of not issuing show cause notice and announcing to carry demolition in Patel Nagar, Khajrana, Indore recorded and filed as Annexure-P-1, to be unconstitutional illegal and capricious. And,

    This Hon'ble Court be further pleased to direct the respondents to follow the procedure prescribed by law by serving the show cause notices, if any, and

    Further, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the respondents not to carry out any demolition against petitioners being the economically weaker section of society, and

    This Hon'ble Court may further kindly be pleased to direct respondents not to interfere with the physical possession/enjoyment of the aforesaid property for which respondents have not issued any show cause notice.

    Further this Hon'ble Court be pleased to grant any other relief as deemed just and proper in favour of the petitioners."

    2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that prior to initiation of any action against the petitioners notices will be served upon them and they shall be afforded opportunity of hearing. It is further submitted that notices upon some of the petitioners have already been served and such notices shall be served upon the remaining petitioners also.

    3. In light of the aforesaid statement, I deem it fit and hence direct the respondents to issue notices to the petitioners and/or the person who are in actual possession of the property. Upon receipt of the notice, the petitioners shall file their individual reply within a period of ten days alongwith all requisite documents. Upon filing of the same, the petitioners shall be individually afforded opportunity of hearing prior to passing of the final order. Till final order is passed, in respect of each of the petitioners, no coercive steps shall be taken against them. In case the final orders are against the petitioners, then they shall be afforded breathing time of ten days for challenging the order, in accordance with law.

    4. It is further directed that till final decision the petitioners shall not carry out any construction, over the property in dispute.

    5. With the aforesaid, without expressing any opinion on merits, the instant petition stands disposed off.

    Certified copy as per rules.

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top