SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(J&K) 63

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
SANJEEV KUMAR, SANJAY PARIHAR, JJ.
Raja Bano – Petitioner
Versus 
Union Territory of J&K And Ors. - Respondents
WP(C) 695 of 2026, CM(1759 of 2026)
Decided On : 08-04-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Yavar Ramzan, Advocate

Show cause notice prior to demolition complies with civil court order for due process of law by providing hearing opportunity; writ challenge thereto is premature due to available alternative remedies.

Headnote:(A) Administrative Law - Show cause notice for demolition of unauthorized construction - Compliance with interim order of civil court restraining demolition except under due process of law - Issuance of show cause notice providing opportunity of hearing constitutes due process and does not violate interim directions - Writ petition challenging show cause notice premature and not maintainable in view of alternative remedies under law. (Paras 04, 05, 06)

Facts of the case:
Impugned show cause notice issued directing petitioner to show cause within two days why single storey house construction be not demolished. Petitioner had filed civil suit wherein interim order restrained respondents from demolishing suit property except under due process of law. Petitioner relied on interim status quo order in another matter. Instead of replying to show cause notice, petitioner filed writ petition.

Findings of Court:
Writ petition dismissed as devoid of merit. Petitioner at liberty to file reply to show cause notice within one week; authority to consider reply and pass appropriate speaking order; copy of order to be communicated to petitioner; no demolition of structure till speaking order passed.

Issues: Whether show cause notice violates interim directions of civil court; maintainability of writ petition challenging show cause notice.

Ratio Decidendi: Show cause notice issued in compliance with civil court directions to follow due process; provides opportunity of hearing; writ petition premature as petitioner has not availed alternative remedy of filing reply.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

ORDER :

01. Impugned in this petition is a show cause notice issued by the Enforcement Officer of J&K Lakes Conservation and Management Authority, Srinagar dated 04.04.2026 whereby the petitioner has been asked to show cause within a period of two days as to why the construction raised by her of a single storey house be not demolished.

02. The impugned notice of show cause is challenged by the petitioner primarily on the ground that the petitioner has already filed a civil suit before the Civil Judge Senior Division (Municipal Magistrate), Srinagar [“the civil Court”] in which there is an interim order directing the respondents rather restraining the respondents from demolishing the suit property or taking any coercive action against the petitioner herein except under due process of low.

03. The petitioner also places reliance upon an interim order of status quo passed by this Court in LPA No. 270/2025 titled “Inhabitants of Block Harwan and Ors. Vs. Union Territory of J&K and Ors

04. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material on record, we are of the considered opinion that the impugned show cause notice has been issued by the respondents to provide an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the same does not violate the interim directions passed by the civil Court.

05. From the perusal of the impugned show cause notice, it clearly transpires that the petitioner apprehending demolition of his house by respondents without following due process of law approached the civil Court by way of a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction. Vide order dated 28.03.2026 the civil Court while giving opportunity to the respondents herein to file written statement also provided by way of an interim arrangement that the suit property shall not be demolished except under due process of law.

06. It is in compliance with the aforesaid directions passed by the civil Court the respondents has embarked upon due process of law and have in the process issued a show cause notice to the petitioner to file his reply. Instead of filing reply to the show cause notice the petitioner has rushed to this Court. The writ petition is not only premature but is also not maintainable in view of the alternative remedies available under law.

07. This petition is found devoid of any merit and the same is, accordingly, dismissed. The petitioner shall, however, be at liberty to file reply to the show cause notice within a period of one week from today and in case such reply is filed the same shall be considered and an appropriate order passed by the Authority in accordance with law.

08. The copy of such order shall be communicated to the petitioner so as to enable him to avail the remedies available against such order. We further provide that till such appropriate speaking order is passed by the respondents there shall be no demolition of the offending structure.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top