SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 466

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT INDORE
Subodh Abhyankar, J.
Rakesh – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Petition No. 4671 of 2023
Decided On : 30-01-2023

Advocates Appeared:
Akhilesh Kumar Saxena, Advocate, Hitendra Tripathi, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

The main legal point established in the judgment is the grant of anticipatory bail in connection with possession of unauthorized liquor under Section 34 (2) of the Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915.

Headnote:

Anticipatory Bail - Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915 - The court granted anticipatory bail to the applicant who was apprehending arrest in connection with possession of unauthorized liquor under Section 34 (2) of the Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant filed an application for grant of anticipatory bail as he was apprehending arrest in connection with possession of unauthorized liquor under Section 34 (2) of the Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that no purpose would be served to send the applicant behind the bar at this stage, as the charge sheet has already been filed, and granted anticipatory bail to the applicant.

Issues: The issue was whether the applicant should be granted anticipatory bail in connection with possession of unauthorized liquor under Section 34 (2) of the Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the fact that the applicant was not earlier arrested during the course of investigation and was issued a notice under Section 41-A of the Code, and found that no purpose would be served to send the applicant behind the bar at this stage.

Final Decision: The court allowed the application and directed that in the event of arrest, the applicant shall be released on bail upon executing a personal bond and furnishing solvent surety.

JUDGMENT

Subodh Abhyankar, J. - They are heard.

2. Perused the case diary / challan papers.

3. This is FIRST application under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (herein after referred to as the Code) filed on behalf of the applicant for grant of anticipatory bail, as the present applicant is apprehending his / her arrest in connection with Crime No.18/2022 registered at Police Station Narsinghgarh, District Rajgarh (MP) for offence punishable under Section 34 (2) of the Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915.

4. The allegation against the applicant is that he was found in possession of 60 bulk liters of unauthorized liquor.

5. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that he was initially arrested along with 60 bulk liters of unauthorized liquor, however, he was released after giving a notice under Section 41-A of the Code.

6. Counsel has also submitted that the date of incident is 09.01.2022 and the applicant has not misused the liberty extended to him, however, at the time of filing of the charge sheet (as the same was not filed within the limitation of six months), the applicant is apprehending that he might be arrested and would be sent behind the bar; and thus, it is submitted that the application be allowed.

7. Counsel for the respondent / State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer. However, it is not denied that the applicant was given a notice under Section 41-A of the Code and there are no criminal antecedents against him.

8. Having considered the rival submissions and on perusal of the case diary and taking note of the fact that the applicant was not earlier arrested during the course of investigation and was issued a notice under Section 41-A of the Code, this Court finds that no purpose would be served to send the applicant behind the bar at this stage, as the charge sheet has already been filed.

9. Accordingly, the application stands allowed. It is directed that in the event of arrest, applicant Rakesh S/o Chunnilal Kushwaha shall be released on bail, upon executing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand only) and furnishing solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer (Investigating Officer).

10. The applicant shall make himself / herself available for interrogation by a Police Officer, as and when required. He / she shall further abide by the other conditions enumerated in Sub Section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

11. Accordingly, Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.4671/2023 stands allowed.

Certified copy as per rules.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top