SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 627

SUBODH ABHYANKAR
Himanshu Chopra – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Manoj Sharma, Advocate, N.S. Bhati, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

JUDGMENT

Subodh Abhyankar, J. - This application has been filed by the applicants under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 for grant of anticipatory bail read with Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for grant of transit anticipatory bail, as they are apprehending their arrest in connection with a crime registered at Police Station Moti Nagar, Police Commissionerrate, Ludhiana vide FIR No.0240/2022 for offence punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

2. In brief, the facts of the case are that the applicant No.1 Himanshu Chopra is engaged in the business of manufacturing the cello tapes etc. In the aforesaid business transaction, the applicant No.1 had obtained certain raw material from the complainant, towards which, the applicant had also gave two cheques of Rs.2.5 Lakh each to the complainant as security. In all, he has already paid a sum of Rs.1,71,120/- and Rs.53,000/- in two different transactions and Rs.2,58,000/- still remains to be paid but as the applicant had already given two separate cheques to the complainant towards security, he has tried to encash the same but the same got dishonored and thus, directly the FIR has been lodged against the applicants.

3.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top