SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 28

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
NARESHKUMAR SOHANLAL JOSHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR ARJUNSINGH B CHAUHAN(11510) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

Table of Content
1. applicant's claim of innocence (Para 2)
2. opposition by the state (Para 3)
3. judicial discretion in bail (Para 4)
4. consideration of various aspects (Para 5)
5. granting of anticipatory bail (Para 6 , 7 , 8)

ORDER :

RULE. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of the respondent No.1 – State of Gujarat.

2. Learned advocate for the applicant submits that the applicant has nothing to do with the offence. The applicant has no past antecedent. Transaction took place in the year 2017 and only with a view to stall the proceedings, impugned complaint is filed in the year 2024. Co-accused are granted bail either by this Court or by the Sessions Court. Nothing is required to be recovered from the applicant. Therefore, custodial interrogation at this stage is not necessary. Besides, the applicant is available during the course of investigation and will not flee from justice. In view of the above, the applicant may be granted anticipatory bail.

4. Having heard the learned advocate for the parties and perusing the investigation papers, it is equally incumbent upon the Court to exercise its discretion judiciously, cautiously and strictly in compliance with t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top