SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 538

GURPAL SINGH AHLUWALIA
Harish Kumar Rathore – Appellant
Versus
Govind Kunwarba – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Shri Anuj Shukla-Advocate, for the Appellant; Y Shri Ramanuj Choubey-Advocate, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

ORDER

1. This petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, has been filed against the order dated 27.06.2022 passed by the Sixth Civil Judge, Junior Division, Sehore, District Sehore in RCS No.129-A/2016, by which the application filed by the petitioner under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC for amendment in the counter claim has been rejected on the ground that the petitioner has failed to file any document to show that he has been dispossessed during the pendency of the suit.

2. The facts necessary for disposal of the present petition, in short, are that the respondent nos.1 to 4 have filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction. Respondent no.5 is the defendant no.2 in the civil suit; whereas petitioner is the defendant no.1 in the civil suit. The petitioner filed his written statement along with a counter claim claiming declaration of title and permanent injunction in respect of the land in dispute. The petitioner thereafter filed an application under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC on the ground that on 11.06.2022 the plaintiff no.1/respondent no.1 and the defendant no.2/respondent no.5 have illegally taken possession of the land in dispute. The petitioner came to kno

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top