Mangilal vs State of Madhya Pradesh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(MP) 581

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT INDORE
Pranay Verma, J.
Mangilal – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 62013 of 2022
Decided On : 02-01-2023

Advocates Appeared:
Pankaj Ajmera, Advocate, Vaibhav Bhagwat, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

Headnote:
Bail - M.P. Excise Act - The court granted bail to the applicant under Section 439 of Cr.P.C after considering the amount of liquor seized from the applicant's possession and the period of custody already undergone by him.
Fact of the Case:

The applicant is implicated in connection with a case registered under the M.P. Excise Act for the possession of unauthorized country made liquor. The applicant has been in custody since 21.10.2022.
Finding of the Court:

The court, after considering the submissions and the case diary, granted bail to the applicant, directing him to be released upon furnishing a personal bond and surety for his regular appearance before the trial court.
Issues: The main issue was whether the applicant should be granted bail considering the amount of liquor seized and the period of custody already undergone.
Ratio Decidendi: The court found that it was a fit case for grant of bail based on the amount of liquor seized and the period of custody already undergone by the applicant.
Final Decision: The application filed by the applicant was allowed, and he was directed to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and surety to the satisfaction of the trial court.

JUDGMENT

Pranay Verma, J. - This is first application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C for grant of bail. The applicant is implicated in connection with Crime No.274/2022, registered at Police Station Karahi, District Khargone , for the offence punishable under Sections 34(2) of M.P. Excise Act.

2. The applicant is in custody since 21.10.2022.

3. The allegation against the applicant is that from the possession of applicant 60 bulk litre unauthorized country made liquor has been seized.

4. Counsel for the applicant submits that he has not committed any offence alleged by the prosecution. He is in jail since 21.10.2022. Investigation is complete and challan has been filed. Final conclusion of trial is likely to take sufficient long time and material produced by the prosecution appears to be insufficient against him. Therefore, the applicant be released on bail.

5. Counsel for the respondent/State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer and prays for rejection of the application.

6. After considering the rival submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and going through the case diary, in the opinion of this Court looking to the amount of liquor seized from the possession of the applicant and the period of custody already undergone by him, it is a fit case for grant of bail.

7. Accordingly, without commenting on the merits of the case, the application filed by the applicant is allowed. The applicant is directed to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his regular appearance before the trial Court during trial with a condition that he shall remain present before the court concerned during trial and shall also abide by the conditions enumerated under Section 437 (3) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.

8. This order shall be effective till the end of the trial, however, in case of bail jump, it shall become ineffective.

Certified copy as per rules.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document