SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1658

SUBODH ABHYANKAR
NAGESHWAR SOLANKI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mukesh Parwal
For the Respondent: Akash Sharma

ORDER :—

Heard finally with the consent of the counsel for the parties.

2. This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 31-3-2007, and 31-7-2007 passed by respondent No. 5, S. P., Ratlam as also against the order dated 13-11-2007 passed by respondent No. 4 Deputy Inspector General of Police, (DIG) Ratlam Range. In the order dated 31-7-2007, a minor penalty of withholding one increment has been imposed upon the petitioner with cumulative effect. However, the same was enhanced to reduction of minimum pay scale for one year with cumulative effect vide order dated 13-11-2007. The petition is also preferred against the order passed in appeal dated 13-9-2008 whereby the order of punishment has been affirmed.

3. The case of the petitioner is that on 18-1-2006 he accosted the complainant Vishal Singh and his friend on a motorcycle and took out Rs. 500/- from his pocket and also demanded Rs. 2,000/-. In the inquiry which was conducted at the instance of the complaint made by Vishal, the petitioner was given a clean chit vide inquiry report dated 9-11-2006. The disciplinary authority S. P. Ratlam, however, disagreed with t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top