SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 915

ANIL VERMA
Sharad – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R. S. Bais for petitioners; Ms. Nisha Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. Petitioner has preferred this criminal revision under section 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C. being aggrieved by the impugned order dated 15.5.2023 passed in S.T. No.58/2023, whereby the charge under section 306 read with section 34 of IPC has been framed against the petitioner.

2. As per the prosecution story, complainant lodged an FIR at P.S. Jeevajiganj, Ujjain on 17.8.2020 by stating that his son Akash was having some financial transaction with the petitioner/accused prior to the incident. On 16.8.2020 present petitioner mentally and physically harassed the deceased for non payment of his money, due to which on 17.8.2020 in the morning time Akash has committed suicide by hanging himself. The deceased also left a suicide note in which name of the petitioner has been mentioned. After the Merg inquiry, offence has been registered against the present petitioner and other co-accused persons.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this matter. Mere demand of borrowed amount cannot be considered as abetment of suicide. The impugned order passed by the learned trial Court is contrary to the law and facts and the mat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top