SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 971

VIVEK AGARWAL
CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INS. CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
ABDUL KARIM KHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: T.S. Lamba.
For the Respondent: M.R. Verma.

ORDER :

1. These appeals are filed by the insurance company being aggrieved of the award dated 1-7-2022 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chhindwara in MACC No. 411 of 2018 and MACC No. 412 of 2018 on the ground that deceased and injured were gratuitous passengers in a pickup van and there being no coverage for the gratuitous passengers, order of pay and recover is contrary to the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs. Asha Rani , AIR 2003 SC 607 .

2. Shri T.S. Lamba, learned counsel for the appellant insurance company reading FIR (Exhibit P-4) submits that it is clearly mentioned by the author of the FIR that deceased, injured and the author of the FIR - Akku S/o Abdul were travelling in a Pickup van bearing registration MP 28 G 4513 along with Megshyam Pawar and Sahil Musalman. The vehicle was being driven rashly and negligently as a result, it turned turtle and Sahil S/o Kalim Musalman died due to crush injuries whereas Meghshyam Pawar sustained injuries and succumbed to the same.

3. Shri M.R. Verma, learned counsel for the claimants, in his turn, reading evidence of Akku submits that PW-2 who has said that in fact the injured an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top