Back
ANAND PATHAK
RASHMI CHAUDHARY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Regard being had to the similitude of the issue involved, all the writ petitions were heard analogously and decided by this common order. For convenience sake, facts of Writ Petition No. 1107/2024 are taken into consideration.
2. The present petition (Writ Petition No. 1107/2024) under Article 226 of the Constitution is preferred by the petitioner seeking following reliefs:
2. That, respondents may kindly be directed to Permit the Petitioner to participate in the selection process for assistant professor.
3. That, any other relief which this Hon’ble High Court may deem fit, with cost of the petition.”
3. Precisely stated facts of the case are that the petitioner is working as Guest Faculty against the post of Assistant Professor (Geography) in Higher Education Department. Petitioner acquired Ph.D. and passed National Eligibility Test. She is serving as Guest Faculty in the Colleges of Higher Education Department since 2004. In the State of Madhya Pradesh
The court established that age relaxation provisions must be interpreted to include current examinations to ensure justice and avoid unnecessary hardship.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of the petitioner to age relaxation similar to other candidates, as supported by the Constitution of India, Article 226, and rel....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
