Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
PREM NARAYAN SINGH
Sumit – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
PREM NARAYAN SINGH, J.
This criminal appeal under Section 374 of Cr.P.C. has been filed by the appellants being disgruntled by the judgment dated 13.08.2024, passed by the learned IInd Additional Sessions Judge, District Ratlam, in Sessions Trial No.110/2023, whereby the appellant has been convicted for offence under Sections 307 & 450 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (hereinafter referred to as "IPC") and sentenced for 04 years R.I. & 02 years R.I. with fine of Rs.2,000/- & Rs.1,000/- and default stipulations.
2. The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows that the complainant Hariom Porwal (PW-1) resides in village Berchha and his milk dairy shop is named as "Hariom Doodh Dairy". The appellant Sumit used to come to the complainant's shop to deliver milk, owing to which, complainant knew the appellant. On 06.01.2023, at around 09:30 pm, the complainant (PW-1) was selling milk at his milk shop, when the appellant- Sumit came to his shop, he was in intoxicating condition on motorcyle and he started to abuse him. While doing so, he asked to give milk. When the complainant asked for money after giving him milk, the appellant said that he did not recognize him and after b
To establish an offense under Section 307 IPC, proof of intent to kill is required; a single injury does not suffice to conclude such intent, allowing for conviction under Section 326 IPC instead.
The court clarified that for a conviction under section 307 IPC, there must be clear evidence of intent to kill, which was not established in this case.
The court clarified that a conviction for attempted murder requires clear evidence of intent, which was lacking, thus warranting a lesser charge.
The court determined that the conviction under Section 307 was unwarranted, affirming instead a conviction under Section 325 for voluntarily causing grievous hurt.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the court has the authority to analyze the evidence and modify the conviction and sentence based on the facts and circumstances of the case.
The intent to commit murder must be proven beyond reasonable doubt, and in this case, it was established that the act fell under grievous hurt.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of different sections of IPC, specifically Section 307, Section 326, and Section 448, in determining the appella....
Witness testimonies cannot be discarded solely due to their relation to the victim; evidence must be considered on credibility and context, with mitigating factors influencing sentencing.
To sustain a conviction under Section 307 IPC, the prosecution must prove intent or knowledge to endanger life, which was not established in this case, resulting in an altered conviction to Section 3....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
