2024 Supreme(MP) 387
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Vivek Rusia and Rajendra Kumar Vani, JJ.
Dhiraj Kumar Sharma v. State of M. P. & Others
Writ Appeal No. 240 of 2024 (Gwalior): against the order
dated 8.9.2023 passed in Writ Petition No.29192/2022;
Decided on 4.7.2024
Jitendra Kumar Sharma for appellant;
Ankur Mody, Additional Advocate General for respondent No.1
/State; Tej Singh Mahadik for respondents No. 2, 3 and 4.
Headnote:
Constitution of India -- Arts. 226/227 and 12 -- maintainability of writ petition -- State -- M. P. State Tourism Development Corporation is Company registered under Companies Act, 1956 but it is incorporated and fully owned by State Government -- entirely funded by State Government -- held -- it is an extended arm of State Government hence is amenable to writ jurisdiction. (1981) 1 SCC 722, (1986) 3 SCC 156 and (2002) 5 SCC 111 followed. ILR (2019) MP 857 relied on. (1969) 1 SCC 585 discussed. [Paras 4 & 10
Hkkjr dk lafo/kku & vuqPNsn 226@227 rFkk 12 & fjV ;kfpdk pyus ;ksX; gksuk & jkT; & e-ç- jkT; i;ZVu fodkl fuxe daiuh vf/kfu;e] 1956 ds vèkhu jftLVªh—r daiuh gS ijarq og jkT; ljdkj }kjk fuxfer gS vkSj mldk iw.kZ LokfeRo jkT; ljdkj ds ikl gS & mldh laiw.kZ fuf/k jkT; ljdkj }kjk nh tkrh gS & vfHkfu/kkZfjr & og jkT; ljdkj dh foLrkfjr 'kk[kk gS vr% fjV vf/kdkfjrk ds v/;/khu gSA ¼1981½ 1 ,llhlh 722] ¼1986½ 3 ,llhlh 156 rFkk ¼2002½ 5 ,llhlh 111 vuqlfjrA vkb,yvkj ¼2019½ ,eih 857 voyafcrA ¼1969½1 ,llhlh 585 foosfprA ¼iSjk 4 ,oa 10½
ORDER
Rusia, J. -- The petitioner/appellant has filed this present writ appeal against the order dated 8.9.2023, whereby the Writ Court has dismissed W.P. No.29192/2022 as not maintainable.
Short facts of the case are as under :--
1. The Madhya Pradesh State Tourism Development Corporation ( in short: MPSTDC) is a government agency that conducts and regulates the tourism activities of Madhya Pradesh, established in 1978 by the Government of M.P. The MPSTDC has headquartered in Bhopal and has regional offices across all the districts of Madhya Pradesh and in other states as well. The MPSTDC also operates homestays, hotels, resorts, and tourist rest houses in different key locations within the state. The MPSTDC issued an advertisement for the appointment of a Marketing Executive on a contract basis. The appellant applied for the said post, and he was called for an interview test. Vide order dated 11.2.2011, he was appointed to the post of Marketing Executive on a fixed salary of Rs.15,000/- per month with certain benefits of leave, TA/DA, deductions etc. Vide order dated 26.2.2011 the appellant was posted at the Regional Office, Gwalior and since then the appellant has been working there. Respondents enhanced the salary of the appellant from time to time.
2. All of a sudden, vide order dated 8.12.2022 appellant/ petitioner has been transferred from Gwalior to the Marketing Office at Lucknow, which he challenged by way of W.P. No.29192/2022 before this Court. While issuing notices interim protection was granted to the petitioner. In the writ petition instead of filing a reply on merit, respondents filed an application seeking dismissal of the petition as not maintainable on the ground that MPT Company is a Company registered under the Companies Act, hence, a writ cannot be issued against the respondent. The appellant filed a reply to the said application by submitting that it is a Government Company that comes under the definition of State under Article 12 of the Constitution of India.
3. Vide order dated 8.9.2023 the Writ Court has dismissed the writ petition as not maintainable. The Writ Court has held that the MPSTDC is a Company registered under the Companies Act and does not have any statutory duty or function to perform, therefore, no mandamus can be issued under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. By placing reliance on a judgment passed in the case of the Praga Tools Corporation v. Shri C.A. Imanual and others reported in (1969) 1 SCC 585, the Writ Court has dismissed the writ petition, hence, this writ appeal before this Court.
We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.
4. It is correct that the MPSTDC is a Company registered under the Companies Act,1956 but undisputedly, this is incorporated and fully owned by the State Government to develop tourism in the State of Madhya Pradesh. This Corporation runs various hotels and restaurants at tourist places to give the facilities to tourists coming from various parts of the country as well as from other countries. The entire MPSTDC is funded by the State Government, therefore, it is an extended arm of the State Government and, hence, amenable to the writ jurisdiction of the High Court. In another way, the MPSTDC helps the Government to develop and promote the cultural heritage of this country, it also brings foreign currency to this country by way of tourism.
5. To seek enhancement of retirement age from 60 to 62 years at par with the Government employees as per the provisions contained in M.P. Shaskiya Sevak (Adhivarshiki Aayu), Sanshodhan Adhiniyam, 2018, a set of employees of the MPSTDC approached this Court by way of writ petitions. All the writ petitions were entertained and vide order dated 12.1.2023, the writ petitions were allowed and the employees of the as per the provisions contained in M.P. Shaskiya Sevak (Adhivarshiki Aayu), Sanshodhan Adhiniyam, 2018 have been given the benefit of the age of retirement up to the age of 62 years. The Writ Court relied