SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 395

ANAND PATHAK
Lakhan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


D. S. Raghuwanshi for petitioner; Ravindra Dixit and M. S. Jadoun, Government Advocates for respondents/State.

ORDER

Heard on admission.

1. Regard being had to the similitude of the controversy, both the matters are being heard analogously and decided by this common order. For convenience sake, facts of writ petition No.5424/2024 are taken into consideration

2. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been preferred by the petitioners seeking following reliefs :--

“(i) That, the impugned order dated 15.2.2024 (Annexure P/1) passed by the respondent No.2 may kindly be quashed and set aside.

(ii) That, other relief which is just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be granted.”

3. Precisely stated facts of the case are that petitioner (In W.P. No.5424/2024) is holding the post of Panchayat Secretary and petitioner (In W.P. No.4521/2024) is holding the post of Sarpanch and both were posted at Gram Panchayat Dhobat, Janpad Panchayat Bhitarwar, District Gwalior w.e.f. 2024 at the relevant point of time. In the year 2021, an inquiry was conducted against the petitioners based upon certain complaints filed. In the said inquiry, misappropriation of funds and corruption was found. It was found that recovery of certain amount is required to be made ag

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top