ANAND PATHAK
MANOJ S/o HANUMANT SINGH RAJPUT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent
ORDER : – Heard on admission.
Petitioner has preferred the instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following reliefs : –
(a) Pleased to quash impugned order dated 24-9-2020 (Annexure P-3) passed by Respondent No. 4, impugned order dated 31-3-2021 (Annexure P-5) and impugned order dated 23-8-2021 (Annexure P-8) in the interest of justice. (b) Pleased to direct respondent authorities to reinstate the petitioner on the post of Gram Rojgar Sahayak, Gram Panchayat Imaliya, Janpad Panchayat Kurwai District Vidisha (M. P.) with backwages. (c) Grant any other relief as this Hon’ble Court deem fit in the present facts and circumstances of the case.
2. It is the submission of counsel for the petitioner that he was appointed as Gram Rojgar Sahayak at Gram Panchayat, Imaliya District Vidisha vide order dated 26-8-2012 (Annexure P-12) and working since then on contract basis from time to time.
3. A complaint was submitted against the petitioner pursuant to which a show cause notice was issued to the petitioner with allegation regarding some illegality/irregularity in construction work done through muster rolls under MANREGA Scheme. It was the allegations that des
A. P. Social Welfare Residential Educational Institutions vs. Pindiga Sridhar
State of Chhattisgarh vs. Dhirjo Kumar Senger
Indu Bhushan Dwivedi vs. State of Jharkhand
Natwar Singh vs. Director of Enforcement
Dharampal Satyapal Ltd. vs. Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, Gauhati.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.