SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 414

SUBODH ABHYANKAR
Sher Khan – Appellant
Versus
Jitendra – Respondent


Advocates:
Rajeev Bhatjiwale for petitioner; Ms. Geetanjali Chaurasia, Government Advocate for respondent No. 2/State.

ORDER

1. Heard finally, with the consent of the parties.

2. This petition has been filed by the petitioner under section 482 of Cr.P.C. against the order dated 21.12.2023 passed in Criminal Revision No.89/2023 by Sessions Judge, Ratlam whereby, the order passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class in Criminal Case No.3053/2014 dated 29.11.2023, allowing the complainant to lead secondary evidence in respect of a photocopy of the agreement, has been affirmed.

3. In brief, the facts of the case are that the petitioner and the respondent No.1 Jitendra entered into an agreement on 1.10.2010, for sale of the land bearing Survey No.1059/1 ad-measuring 0.020 hectares for a consideration of Rs.11,64,000/-. According to this agreement, the sale deed was to be executed on or before 1.2.2011, and on 19.5.2011, i.e., after expiry of the period as provided in the aforesaid agreement, the petitioner executed a registered sale deed in favour of Nathulal and Bhagwatilal, which led the respondent No.1 Jitendra to file a private complaint, which was registered as Criminal Case No.RCT 3053/2014, in which, at the time of recording of evidence, the respondent No.1 by filing an application under section

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top