SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 441

G. S. AHLUWALIA, VISHAL MISHRA
Ashish Pathak – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Akshay Pawar for appellant;
Abhishek Singh, Government Advocate for respondent/State.

Table of Content
1. criminal appeal details and convictions outlined (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. defense arguments against the conviction (Para 9 , 10)
3. circumstantial evidence requirements discussed (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 18)
4. post-mortem findings confirm homicide (Para 19 , 20)
5. last seen principle explained (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
6. witness testimonies regarding last seen (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 35 , 36)
7. seizure of articles and fsl report examination (Para 39 , 40 , 41)
8. analysis of circumstantial evidence and final judgment conclusions (Para 42 , 43 , 44)
9. final verdict and order to acquit (Para 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49)

JUDGMENT

Ahluwalia, J. -- 1. This Criminal Appeal under section 374(2) of Cr.P.C. has been filed against the Judgment and Sentence dated 9.6.2010 passed by 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Rewa in S.T. No.332/2009, by which the appellant has been convicted and sentenced for the following offences:

S. No.

Conviction under section

Sentence

1.

302 of IPC

Life Imprisonment and fine of Rs. 5,000/- in default 2 years R.I.

2.

201 of IPC

2 years R.I. and fine of Rs. 500/- in default 6 months R.I.

2. According

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top