SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 475

ANAND PATHAK, HRIDESH
Ramcharan Raghuvanshi – Appellant
Versus
Ujala – Respondent


Advocates:
F.A. Shah for appellant;
Vibhor Kumar Sahu for respondent

JUDGMENT

1. The present appeal is against the judgment and decree dated 16.11.2022 passed in Case No.61-A of 2017 (HMA) by Principal Judge, Family Court, Ashok Nagar whereby the petition under section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 [in brevity '' the HM Act'']filed by husband seeking divorce on the ground of ''cruelty and desertion'' was dismissed.

2. The averments as made by appellant are that on 26th of April, 2014 his marriage was solemnized with respondent as per Hindu rites and rituals without any dowry. After a few days of marriage i.e. on 25.6.2014 for the first time, when respondent came to her in-laws house, she told him that she wanted to marry a boy of her choice but under pressure of her relatives, she married him against her will and did not like him. She stayed at her in-laws house for only three days and during this period, there was no physical relationship between them. When respondent came to her in-laws house for the second time, her behaviour and attitude was not good towards him and his family and she used to say that she is in job and does not know how to do household work. She stayed at her in-laws house for nearly 13-14 days and during this period, she cre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top