SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 334

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
SHEEL NAGU, VINAY SARAF, JJ.
KARANDEEP SINGH CHAWLA – Petitioner
Versus
GURSHISH KARANDEEP CHAWLA – Respondent
F.A. No. 712 of 2020
Decided On : 01-03-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sankalp Kochar.
For the Respondent: Rajesh Maindiretta.

The court held that prolonged separation and actions causing mental anguish, including false accusations, constitute sufficient grounds for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act.

Headnote:(A) HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955 - Sections 13(1)(i-a) and 13(1)(i-b) - Petition for divorce on grounds of mental cruelty and desertion dismissed by Family Court - Appellant (husband) appealed claiming mental cruelty via false complaints and desertion since 8-7-2014 with no intention of return - Family Court held allegations vague without substantial proof (Paras 1, 18).

(B) The Supreme Court upheld that prolonged separation can justify mental cruelty, observing that the wife's actions were detrimental to the husband, constituting both cruelty and desertion (Paras 15.7, 18.9).

Facts of the case:
Marriage solemnized on 9-2-2014; living separately since 8-7-2014, with multiple litigations initiated by the wife against the husband and his family members, leading to claims of mental cruelty (Paras 2, 4.6, 18).

Findings of Court:
Family Court dismissed the divorce petition, citing lack of evidence for allegations; however, improper conduct of the wife was noted, impacting the husband's mental health, and leading to the conclusion of irretrievable breakdown (Paras 15.1, 18.9).

Issues: Key issues included proof of cruelty, justification for non-compliance of maintenance orders, and allegations of desertion by the wife (Paras 8.1, 18, 19.1).

Ratio Decidendi: The court's reasoning underscored that mental cruelty can stem from misleading accusations leading to deep anguish; prolonged absence of cohabitation while launching false complaints constitutes desertion (Paras 18.8, 19.1).

Result: Appeals allowed; marriage dissolved on grounds of cruelty and desertion.

Table of Content
1. background of the divorce petition (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. accusations of cruelty from both parties (Para 4 , 5)
3. family court's dismissal of husband's petition (Para 6 , 9)
4. assessment of credibility of complaints and arguments (Para 8 , 10)
5. legal definitions of cruelty and desertion (Para 11)
6. proving desertion and its implications (Para 12 , 14)
7. conclusion of mental cruelty leading to divorce (Para 18 , 19)
8. final ruling on decree of divorce (Para 20)

JUDGMENT :

VINAY SARAF, J.

1. Appellant/husband seeking decree of divorce on the ground of mental cruelty and desertion had preferred petition under section 13(1)(i-a), 13(1)(i-b) of HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955 (in short ‘H.M. Act’) on 29-8-2018 before VIth Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kalyan, District Thane (Maharashtra), which was transferred by Supreme Court vide order dated 13-9-2019 passed in T.C. (Civil) No. 813/2019 to the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Jabalpur and registered as Case No. 1127/2019. After trial, Family Court dismissed petition by impugned judgment and decree dated 13-10-2020, which are assailed by appellant/husband in present appeal under section 19 of the FAMILY COURTS ACT , 1985 read with section 28 of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955.

2. Marriage between parties was solemnized on 9-2-2014 according to Sikh Rights and Rituals at Ulhasnagar, District Thane (Maharashtra). They were blessed with a baby girl on 4-12-2014. It is admitted in present matter that they are living separately since 8-7-2014 and lived together for 5 months only.

3. For the sake of convenience, appellant hereinafter is referred to as “husband” and respondent as “wife.”

Husband’s pleading in divorce petition:

4. On 29-8-2018 husband filed petition for divorce on ground of cruelty and desertion and pleaded infra:

    4.1 Husband stated in petition that during the tenure of wife’s stay at her matrimonial home after marriage, her behaviour was not good and polite towards husband and his family and she was disobedient, adamant and used to demand huge amount for her personal expenditure, without disclosing the need. Wife was very much attached with her parents and used to talk to her mother daily on mobile and her parents visited her twice or thrice at her matrimonial home.

    4.2 Husband further pleaded that since day one, nature of wife was arrogant and she never paid any heed towards him and did not bother about feelings of her husband. He further pleaded that when wife was pregnant, everyone was happy in the family of husband and Gynecologist advised wife to take rest and avoid travelling despite that she travelled by car many times unnecessarily.

    4.3 According to husband parents of wife came to Ulhasnagar and on 8-7-2014 with the permission of parents of husband took wife to her parental home with an assurance that she will return on 23-7-2014, however, she never returned and on phone calls started demanding cash, document, certificate, gold ornaments, clothes etc. Thereafter, wife’s father asked husband to prepare consent affidavit for breakup. Husband and his family members were not able to understand the reason of such a harsh decision, they pleaded with wife’s father but to no avail.

    4.4 Husband further pleaded that he tried his level best to save marriage, but wife never supported and she was not ready to live with him and filed false case under the provisions of Domestic Violence Act against husband and his family members in Jabalpur followed by false maintenance case. Husband was forced to file M.P. No. 193/2015 for divorce against wife before Kalyan Court, which was transferred by Supreme Court to Family Court, Jabalpur. In the meantime, wife lodged false report against husband and his family members under section 498-A of INDIAN PENAL CODE , which was registered at Police Station Gorakhpur, Jabalpur.

    4.5 It is stated by husband that wife also lodged false F.I.R. under section 420 of INDIAN PENAL CODE at Police Station Gorakhpur, Jabalpur against rela

                      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                      1
                      2
                      3
                      4
                      5
                      6
                      7
                      8
                      9
                      10
                      11
                      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                      supreme today icon
                      logo-black

                      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                      Please visit our Training & Support
                      Center or Contact Us for assistance

                      qr

                      Scan Me!

                      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                      whatsapp-icon Back to top