SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 480

PRANAY VERMA
Virendra Pagare – Appellant
Versus
Dharmesh Jain – Respondent


Advocates:
Vinay Zelawat with Anendra Singh Parihar for appellant;
Harish Joshi for respondent No.1.

JUDGMENT

1. This appeal under section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been preferred by defendant No.2 being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 4.2.2002 passed in Civil Suit No.33-A/1997 by the Second Additional District Judge, Indore, whereby the claim of plaintiff/respondent No.1 for specific performance of contract dated 5.5.1998 has been decreed.

2. The claim of plaintiff is that defendant No.1 had entered into an agreement with him for sale of the suit property, which is a flat bearing number 301, for a consideration of Rs.3.50 lakhs on 5.5.1995. A written agreement was also executed between them on that day and entire sale consideration was also paid by plaintiff to defendant No.1 who had agreed that she would soon deliver possession of the suit flat to him and shall execute the requisite sale deed in his favour. She had also requested that even though there is an averment in the agreement that possession has been handed over to plaintiff, but she may be permitted to retain possession till she finds alternate accommodation for herself. The plaintiff accepted the said request but defendant No.1 did not deliver possession to her. On 15.10.1997 she assured the plain

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top