SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 645

SUBODH ABHYANKAR
J. K. Brothers – Appellant
Versus
Ranchood Kashap S/O Shri Balmukudh Kashap – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :SHRI AYUSHYAMAN CHOUDHARY, ADVOCATE)
For the Respondent: SHRI NITIN NANOREYA, ADOCATE

ORDER :

1. This order shall also govern the disposal of M.P.No.5665 of 2023, M.P 5629 of 2023 and M.P.5737 of 2023, as in all these cases, identical issues are involved. For the sake of convenience, the facts as narrated in M.P.No.5629 of 2023, have been taken into consideration.

2. These miscellaneous petitions have been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 04.09.2023 passed in Summary Suit no.193B/2022 by Third, Civil Judge, Class-I, Indore; whereby, the application filed by petitioners/defendants under Order 37 Rule 3(5) read with section 151 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (herein after referred to as “CPC’) has been partly allowed and while allowing the leave to defend to petitioners/defendants, it has also ordered to deposit the entire claim of the respondent/plaintiff by way of furnishing solvent surety.

3. Counsel for the petitioners has drawn attention of this Court to the finding recorded by the learned judge of the civil Court wherein it is held that the defendants have raised certain grounds which can only be decided after the evidence is led by the parties and thus, it is submitted that the petitioners have already made a ground for t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top