SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 604

VIVEK RUSIA
Rajpalsingh S/o Shri Ishwarsingh Sisodiya – Appellant
Versus
Dilip Anjana S/o Late Shri Vikramsingh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Murtuza Bohra
For the Respondent Sameer Anant Athawale

ORDER :

1. The petitioner/defendant has filed the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India being aggrieved by the order dated 19.01.2021 passed by the Additional District Judge, Badnagar Districti - Ujjain, whereby the application filed under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been dismissed.

2. Respondents No. 1 & 2/plaintiff filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction in respect of land bearing Survey No. 115/2 area 3.380 hectare situated at Village - Nanyakhedi, Tehsil - Badnagar, District - Ujjain. According to the plaintiffs, they are the joint owner of the suit land and no partition has taken place. Plaintiff No. 1 was in need of money, for which he borrowed an amount of Rs.13,00,000/- from defendant No. 1. In order to execute the agreement, she was called in the office of Deputy Registrar, where defendant No. 1 obtained her signature on blank paper and got prepared a forged power of attorney. Again they were in need of money and requested defendant No. 1 to give a loan of Rs.15,00,000/-. Plaintiff No. 2 put thumb impression on blank paper in the Office of Deputy Registrar and the amount was paid to her by way of cheque.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top