VIVEK RUSIA
Rajpalsingh S/o Shri Ishwarsingh Sisodiya – Appellant
Versus
Dilip Anjana S/o Late Shri Vikramsingh – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The petitioner/defendant has filed the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India being aggrieved by the order dated 19.01.2021 passed by the Additional District Judge, Badnagar Districti - Ujjain, whereby the application filed under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been dismissed.
2. Respondents No. 1 & 2/plaintiff filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction in respect of land bearing Survey No. 115/2 area 3.380 hectare situated at Village - Nanyakhedi, Tehsil - Badnagar, District - Ujjain. According to the plaintiffs, they are the joint owner of the suit land and no partition has taken place. Plaintiff No. 1 was in need of money, for which he borrowed an amount of Rs.13,00,000/- from defendant No. 1. In order to execute the agreement, she was called in the office of Deputy Registrar, where defendant No. 1 obtained her signature on blank paper and got prepared a forged power of attorney. Again they were in need of money and requested defendant No. 1 to give a loan of Rs.15,00,000/-. Plaintiff No. 2 put thumb impression on blank paper in the Office of Deputy Registrar and the amount was paid to her by way of cheque.
Ambika Prasad & Others vs. Shri Ram Shiromani @ Chandrika Prasad Dwivedi & Another
Sunil S/o Dev Kumar Radhelia & Others vs. Awadh Narayan & Others
Executants of a deed seeking annulment must pay ad-valorem court fee, while non-executants may only need to pay a fixed fee for a declaration of the deed's invalidity.
A sale deed executed after the cancellation of a power of attorney is void and does not require payment of ad valorem court fees.
In cases where non-executants seek declarations regarding deeds, they may need to pay fixed court fees, not ad valorem, provided they are not seeking possession.
The court clarified that a non-executant must pay ad valorem court fees for declaring a sale deed void, capped at Rs.1,50,000 under the Madhya Pradesh Amendment.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that in a civil suit seeking joint possession, the plaintiffs are liable to pay ad valorem court fee as per Section 7(iv)(c) of the Court Fees Act,....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.