G. S. AHLUWALIA
Pushpendra @ Kallu Gautam – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This application under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking the following reliefs:
2. By this application the applicant has sought quashment of FIR in Crime No. 520/2023, registered at Police Station Hata, District Damoh for offence under Section 306 of IPC.
3. It is submitted by counsel for applicant that during the pendency of this application charges have been framed. However, the same have not been challenged by filing any revision. Thus, it is submitted that merely because the charges have been framed during the pendency of this application, therefore, this application would not render infructuous and still it can be decided on merits.
4. The facts necessary for disposal of the present application in short are that an
Amit Kapur vs. Ramesh Chander and Another
Amalendu Pal @ Jhantu vs. State of West Bengal
Chitresh Kumar Chopra v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
Kishori Lal v. State of M.P. (2007) 10 SCC 797
M. Mohan vs. State Represented by the Deputy Superintendent of Police
Praveen Pradhan vs. State of Uttaranchal and Another
Ramesh Kumar v. State of Chhattisgarh
Ramesh Kumar vs. State of Chhattisgarh
State of Punjab v. Iqbal Singh
Sonti Rama Krishna v. Sonti Shanti Sree
Sanju @ Sanjay Singh Sengar vs. State of M.P. (2002) 5 SCC 371
To establish abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC, there must be clear instigation or intentional aid; mere suspicion or threats are insufficient.
Abetment of suicide requires clear connection between accused's actions and the suicide, with established mens rea of instigation or provocation.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the prosecution to establish a clear mens rea and active act to push the deceased into a position to commit suicide in cases of....
Continuous harassment and threats can constitute instigation for abetment of suicide under IPC, necessitating careful examination of circumstances surrounding the act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of mens rea and direct or active instigation for the offence of abetment under Section 306 of the IPC. The judgment also emphasizes....
To establish abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC, there must be clear evidence of the accused's intention to instigate the suicide, which was absent in this case.
To establish abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC, there must be direct acts of incitement closely linked to the suicide, and mere denial of marriage does not constitute abetment.
To establish abetment of suicide, there must be clear evidence of instigation or actions compelling the victim to take their life, not merely trivial domestic disputes.
For a charge under Section 306 IPC, clear evidence of instigation or aiding in suicide is required; mere allegations of harassment are insufficient.
To establish abetment of suicide under IPC, there must be clear evidence of instigation or aiding, which was absent in this case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.