Abdul Kareem vs State of Madhya Pradesh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(MP) 11

SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, ANURADHA SHUKLA
Abdul Kareem – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Gyan Prakash Tripathi for petitioner;
Ritwik Parashar, Government Advocate for respondent/State.

ORDER

Dharmadhikari, J. -- 1. Heard finally with the consent of both the parties.

2. The instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed in the nature of Habeas Corpus assailing the order of preventive detention passed by the District Magistrate Seoni on 1.7.2024, annexure P/2 by exercising powers under section 3(2) of the National Security Act, 1980 (for brevity 'the NSA') as well as the consequential order of extension of the detention period dated 13.9.2024 by extending the detention of the petitioner for a period of further three months.

3. Brief facts of the case are that Police Station Dhuma, District Seoni registered Crime No.214/2024 against the petitioner for the offence under section 153-A and 120-B of IPC and section 4, 9 of M.P.Gou Vansh Vadh Pratishedh Adhiniyam, 2004 and section 11(1)(l) of Pashu Krurta Nivaran Adhiniyam. During this period, the Collector/respondent No.2 has registered NSA proceeding against the petitioner and passed detention order on 1.7.2024 vide Order No.1644/Reader/NSA/2024 for a period of three months. However, the petitioner was granted bail by this Court. But, the petitioner could not be released because of the im