MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, NALIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Saud Akhtar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, J.
1. Heard Mr. Malay Prasad alongwith Ms. Saloni Mathur and Ms. Tanya Makker, learned counsel for the petitioners; Sri Arvind Singh, learned counsel for the Union of India and Sri A.N. Mullah & Sri S.A. Murtaza, learned A.G.A. for the State respondents.
2. Present Habeas Corpus Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is preferred seeking following reliefs:-
II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned Notification No.111/2/04/2022-C.X-6 Lucknow dated 07.04.2022 issued by respondent no.2 in exercise of the power under Section 3 (3) (4) of National Security Act, 1980 (Annexure No.2).
III. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 11.04.2022 passed by respondent no.3, by which the representation of the petitioners has been rejected (Annexure No.3).
IV. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impu
Dharmendra Suganchand Chelawat Vs. Union of India
Vijay Narain Singh Vs. State of Bihar
Binod Singh Vs. District Magistrate, Dhanbad
Arun Ghosh v. State of West Bengal
Quamarul Islam vs. S.K. Kanta and Ors.
Konungjao Singh vs. State of Manipur & Ors.
Kanu Biswas Vs. State of West Bengal
Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Vs. State of Bihar and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.