SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 675

VINAY SARAF
Chanchal Gupta (Smt. ) – Appellant
Versus
Rakhi Dhali – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Rajas Pohankar for petitioner; Rahul Rajpoot for respondents.

Table of Content
1. petitioner declared elected; election challenged (Para 2)
2. election petition must have verification and security (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. conversion of appeal to election petition requires compliance with rules (Para 9 , 10)
4. order allowing amendment is set aside (Para 11)
5. petition allowed; no costs (Para 12)

ORDER

1. The petitioner has assailed the order dated 9.11.2022 passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Revenue, Shahpur District Betul, whereby learned Sub Divisional Officer allowed the application filed under Order 6 rule 17 of the CPC and permitted the respondent to carry out the amendment in the appeal preferred by the respondent under section 91 of the M.P. Panchayat Raj Evam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act, 1993').

2. The short facts of the case are that the petitioner and the respondent contested for the post of Panch for Ward No.16 of Gram Panchayat, Chopana, DistrictBetul. On 14.7.2022, Returning Officer declared the petitioner as elected and issued a certificate in favour of the petitioner. Being aggrieved by the election of the petitioner, the respondent filed an appeal under Section 91 of the Act, 1993 assailing the certifi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top