SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 116

ANAND PATHAK, HIRDESH
Swati Patel – Appellant
Versus
Chandrabhan Patel – Respondent


Advocates:
Susant Tiwari for appellant;
Arun Dudawat and Rahul Jha for respondent.

JUDGMENT

Hirdesh, J. -- 1. The instant appeal is filed by appellant-wife under section 19 of the Family Courts Act read with section 96 of the CPC against judgment and decree dated 5.10.2024 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court District Datia in Case No. 173/2022 (HMA) whereby an application filed by respondent-husband seeking a decree of divorce under section 13(1)(i-a) of HM Act on the ground of ''cruelty'' has been allowed.

2. It is not in dispute that appellant and respondent are husband wife and they entered into the wedlock on 9.2.2020 by performing all the customs and ritual which are essential to perform a Hindu marriage.

3. In brief the facts giving rise to present appeal are that respondent husband filed a divorce petition in the Family Court Datia on the ground of cruelty and pleaded that on the very next day of marriage the appellant-wife told her husband that she has been forced to perform this marriage against her will and she refused to cohabit with respondent husband and their marriage could not have been consumed. Further, it has been alleged in the divorce petition that the appellant-wife expressed her will to study further and in turn her in-laws said that they

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top