SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 4

SUJOY PAUL, AMAR NATH KESHARWANI
Abhishek Parashar – Appellant
Versus
Neha Parashar – Respondent


Advocates:
Ashish Shroti and Piyush Tiwari for appellant;
Pushpendra Dubey for respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. The common judgment dated 27th March, 2019 passed in RCS No. 1289A/2015 and RCS No. 516A / 2017 is subject matter of challenge in these appeals. RCS No. 1289A/2015 was an application filed under section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (H.M. Act) by the husband seeking decree of divorce on various grounds whereas other RCS was an application filed under section 9 of H.M. Act by the wife for restitution of conjugal rights. The Court below by the impugned judgment dated 27th March, 2019 decided both the matters and while rejecting the RCS No. 516A /2017 passed judgment and decree in RCS No. 1289A/2015 and granted a decree of judicial separation in favour of the husband.

2. The parties are at logger heads on the validity of this common judgment dated 27th March, 2019. The grievance of appellant– husband is that as per the findings given by the Court below, a clear case was made out by the husband for grant of a decree of divorce. The Court below has committed an error in not granting the decree of Divorce and instead granted a decree of judicial separation.

3. The grievance of wife is that the finding given by the Court below shows that there was a possibility of reunion betw

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top