SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 83

VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
Manish – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Akash Rathi for petitioner; Vishal Panwar, Government Advocate for respondents/State.

ORDER

1. The present petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 23.8.2024 passed by respondent No.2 whereby the claim of the petitioner for compassionate appointment in place of his father Late Mukesh Pandit has been rejected on the ground that petitioner has failed to file copy of the registered adoption deed for consideration of claim for compassionate appointment.

2. The facts of the case are that the petitioner is the adopted son of Late Shri Mukesh Kumar Pandit. The father of the Petitioner Late Mr. Mukesh Kumar Pandit S/o Shri Balkrishna Pandit was working on the post of Assistant Grade-3 under the Office of Development Block Education Officer, Tribal Affairs Department Dist Barwani. On 12.4.2022 the father of the petitioner Mr. Mukesh Kumar Pandit died while he was serving on the said post and the father of the petitioner was the sole earning member of the family. Subsequently, due to the loss of the father of the petitioner, the petitioner’s family became impecunious due to which the petitioner made an application for compassionate appointment with all the relevant documents including adoption document executed on the affidavi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top