SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 166

MILIND RAMESH PHADKE
Ashok Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Council Dabra – Respondent


Advocates:
Ms. Yasika Nayak for petitioner; Ashwini Johri for respondent No. 2.

ORDER

1. The present petition, under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner/workman being aggrieved by the Award dated 20.3.2020 passed by the Labour Court No.1, Gwalior whereby compensation of Rs.50,000/- in lieu of reinstatement and backwages, has been awarded.

2. Challenging the Award passed by the Court below, the counsel for petitioner has submitted that the respondent did not file any document to prove that the petitioner, who being appointed as Labour in the Municipal Corporation, Dabra on 20.8.2013 has worked for more than 240 days in a calendar year (from 20.8.2013 to 12.7.2015) and as the respondent was in possession of every document, it should had proved that the petitioner has not worked for the said statutory period since it is well established principle of law that if a party, who is in possession of best evidence, fails to produce the same then, an adverse inference is to be drawn against it, but even though it was held that the petitioner was illegally retrenched, he was not reinstated with back-wages. In alternate, it was argued that the compensation in lieu of reinstatement is meagre and it should have been in conformity with

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top