SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 172

SANJAY DWIVEDI
Pinky Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Alok Kumar Sharma and Ms. Priti Singh for petitioner; Girish Kekre, Government Advocate for respondents/State

ORDER

1. The petitioner, by means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is seeking quashing of communication dated 9.8.2024 (Annexure-P/1) whereby she has been denied joining on the ground that she does not have the requisite qualification to be appointed as a Middle School Teacher (English).

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that despite the petitioner’s selection vide order dated 30.11.2022 (Annexure-P/7) on the post of Middle School Teacher (English), she is not being allowed to join on the said post saying that she does not have the requisite qualification prescribed on the date of advertisement. It is contended that the petitioner fulfills all the requisite qualification and as such, the reason assigned in the impugned communication dated 9.8.2024 (Annexure-P/1) is improper and contrary to law.

3. On the other hand, learned Government Advocate has submitted that on 18.2.2019, an amendment has come in the respective rules known as Madhya Pradesh Tribes and Scheduled Castes Teaching Cadre (Service and Recruitment) rules, 2018, wherein the requisite qualification for the post of Middle School Teacher (English) has been prescribed wh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top