SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 174

VIVEK RUSIA, GAJENDRA SINGH
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Nataskee Incorporation – Respondent


Advocates:
Aviral Vikas Khare for appellant; Brijesh Garg and Vishal Lashkari for respondent.

ORDER

Rusia, J:--

1. This Arbitration Appeal under section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been preferred against the order dated 25.2.2025 passed by the learned District Judge, Commercial Court, Indore in MJC AV No. 12 of 2025 whereby the learned Court while exercising powers under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 granted interim relief in favour of the Respondent.

THE FACTS OF THE CASE, IN SHORT, ARE AS UNDER:-

2. Appellant No.2 i.e. Divisional Manager, Western Railway, Ratlam had issued a Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) bearing No. EL-2024-2025-09 dated 27.7.2024 of installation of Solar Grid systems at various locations within the Ratlam Railway Division. The Respondent participated in the tendering process and was declared the lowest bidder (L1).

3. Consequently, a Letter of Acceptance (LOA) was issued in favour of the respondent on 29.11.2024. As per the terms of the LOA and the Indian Railways General Conditions of Contract (GCC), 2022, the Respondent was mandatorily required to submit a Performance Guarantee (PG) within 21 days, i.e., on or before 20.12.2024 with a provision for extension up to 60 days i.e. till 27.1.2025 on payment of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top