SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 161

ASHISH SHROTI
Manish Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
Waqf Zama Masjid Intzamiya Committee Thr. – Respondent


Advocates:
Santosh Agrawal for applicants; Chandra Prakash Sharma for respondent No. 1.

ORDER

1. The applicants/defendants have filed this Civil Revision under section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure challenging the order dated 28.7.2021 passed by First Additional Judge to the Court of First Civil Judge, Class-II, Morena (M.P.) in Civil Suit No.160-A of 2020 whereby their application under Order 7 rule 11 CPC has been rejected by the learned Trial Court.

2. For convenience the applicants are referred as 'defendants' and respondent No.1 is referred as 'plaintiff' in this order.

3. The facts which are not in dispute are that the plaintiff has filed a suit for eviction against the defendants in the court of First Additional Judge to the Court of First Civil Judge, Class-II, Morena (in short 'Civil Court'). The property in question is a Waqf Property is also not in dispute between the parties. On being summoned, the defendants appeared and filed the present application under Order 7 rule 11 CPC praying for rejection of the plaint on the ground that since the property in question is a Waqf Property, the Civil Suit before the Civil Court is not maintainable and the remedy to the plaintiff lies before the Waqf Tribunal constituted under the provisions of Waqf Act, 1995 (in short

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top