SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(MP) 324

S.A.DHARMADHIKARI
Vinod Kumar Goyal – Appellant
Versus
Avneet Kumar Gupta – Respondent


Advocates:
Sunil Kumar Jain for appellant;
S.K. Shrivastava for respondents.

JUDGMENT

Heard on the question of admission.

1. The appellant/tenant being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 2.11.2015 passed in First Appeal No.31/2015 by the IInd Additional District Judge, Shivpuri confirming the judgment and decree dated 28.4.2015 passed in Civil Suit No.147-A/2012 by the II Civil Judge, Class II, Shivpuri, whereby the suit filed by the landlord/plaintiff for eviction on the ground mentioned in section 12(1)(f) of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (herein after referred to as “the Act”) has been allowed.

2. A suit for eviction and recovery of rent was filed by the plaintiff/landlord in respect of a shop situated in ward No.6, Dharamshala Road, in front of Nagrik Bank, Shivpuri, Tahsil and District Shivpuri ad-measuring about 18 feet in length from north to south and breath about 10 feet from east to west. On the east is a shop known as furniture point owned by one Gaurav Goyal, to the west there is a shop known as Shyam Traders owned by Prem Kumar Goyal, in north Dharamshala Road is situated and in the south, residential house of the plaintiff/landlord is situated.

3. The plaintiff/landlord in the plaint had stated that he is in bona fide requiremen














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top