SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 377

SUJOY PAUL, SHAILENDRA SHUKLA
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Kailash Chandra – Respondent


Advocates:
J.P. Cama with Bharat Chitle and S.R.Kochatta for appellants;
L.C. Patne for respondent.

ORDER

Paul, J.-- 1. These writ appeals filed u/S.2(1) of Madhya Pradesh Uchcha Nyayalay (Khand Nyaypeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005 are directed against the common order dated 7th December, 2017 passed in WP No.5474/2009 (Kailash Chandra Meena v. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd and another) and in WP No.2981/2010 (Mangilal Rathore v. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and another) decided on 7th December, 2017.

2. The learned single Judge allowed the writ petitions and set aside the punishment orders of dismissal passed by the disciplinary authority. The matter was remanded back to the disciplinary authority to pass any other punishment order except dismissal, removal, termination or compulsory retirement. The respondents were directed to be reinstated forthwith in service with further direction to pay arrears of salary, increments and other consequential benefits.

3. The appellants/employer is aggrieved by this order and assailed it in these Writ Appeals.

Petitioner’s Submissions :

4. Shri Cama, learned Sr.counsel assisted by Shri Chitle and Shri Kochatta, learned counsel

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top