SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 384

G. S. AHLUWALIA
Rajesh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Hemant Singh Rana, R.K. Shrivastava and Amit Kumar Goswami for appellants; Smt. Padmashri Agarwal for respondent/State.

JUDGMENT

1. By this common judgment, Criminal Appeal filed by Laxman @ Bhura (Cr.A. No. 882/2011) and Rahul @ Chhaviram (Cr.A.701/2018) shall also be finally disposed of.

2. With the consent of parties, the appeal is heard finally.

3. It is submitted by Shri M.S. Rana that in compliance of the order of this Court, the appellant Rajesh is present in his office. Similarly, Shri R.K. Shrivastav also submitted that appellant Laxman @ Bhura is present in his office. Appellant Rahul @ Chhaviram is in jail. Since the physical hearing is not going on, therefore, the presence of the appellants Rajesh and Laxman @ Bhura is marked without obtaining their signatures.

4. These Criminal Appeals have been filed under section 374 of Cr.P.C against the judgment and sentence dated 2.8.2011 passed in Special Sessions Trial No. 6/2009 by which appellant Rajesh and Laxman @ Bhura were convicted for offence under sections 392, 397 of IPC r/w section 13 of MPDVPK Act 1981 and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment of seven years with fine of Rs. 500/- with default rigorous imprisonment of three months. Since the appellant Rahul @ Chavi Ram jumped bail during pendency of the trial, and was arrested at a l

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top