SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 445

SHEEL NAGU, ANAND PATHAK
State of M. P. – Appellant
Versus
Jyoti Sharma – Respondent


Advocates:
M.P.S. Raghuvanshi, Additional Advocate General for appellant/State; Jitendra Sharma for respondent.

ORDER

1. Present intra-Court appeal preferred u/S. 2 (1) of the Madhya Pradesh Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyaypeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005 assails final order dated 25.11.2020 passed in W.P. No.15382/2020 (S) by learned Single Judge while exercising writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of Constitution of India allowing petition in question by which the challenge was made to an order dated 9.9.2020 passed by respondent No.2/appellant No.2 rejecting claim for compassionate appointment of respondent (petitioner in wp) who happened to be married daughter of deceased Government servant who died in harness on the post of ASI (M).

2. The order passed by learned Single Judge while allowing the petition directing for reconsideration of case of respondent/petitioner is based on the Larger Bench decision rendered by Bench comprising three Judges in case of Meenakshi Dubey v. M.P. Poorva Kschetra Vidyut Vitran Co. Ltd, on 2.3.2020 in W.A. No.756/2019, [Reported in 2020(1) JLJ 335] where the Larger Bench held thus :

“17. We are not oblivious of the settled legal position that compassionate appointment is an exception to general rule. As per the policy of compassionate appointment, State has al

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top