SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 418

SANJAY DWIVEDI
Suresh Pateria – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Naveen Dubey for Petitioner; Miss. Anjali Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer for respondents No. 1 to 3/State; Ankit Saxena for respondent No. 5

ORDER

1. This petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner by the instant petition is questioning the legality, validity and propriety of the order dated 3.7.2020 (Annexure-P/1), passed by the State Cooperative Tribunal, Bhopal.

2. To decide the issue involved in the case, the necessary facts are adumbrated as under :-

As per the petitioner, the Board of Directors of respondent-Bank (respondent No.4 herein) passed a resolution on 23.1.2019 regarding appointment of the petitioner as a Samiti Prabandhak and an order in this regard was issued on 24.1.2019, in pursuance to which, the charge has been given to the petitioner. The Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Chhatarpur wrote a letter on 4.2.2019 (Annexure-P/4) to the General Manager, District Cooperative Central Bank Maryadit, Chhatarpur asking to produce some record regarding the appointment of the then Branch Manager after the death of the then Cooperative Branch Manager, namely, Braj Nandan Bajpai. In response to the said letter, the Branch Manager of respondent No.2 issued an order dated 18.2.2019 (Annexure-P/5) asking respondent No.5 to give the charge of Branch Manager, Seva Sahakari

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top