Suresh Chand Sharma vs State of M. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(MP) 401

ANAND PATHAK
Suresh Chand Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Sameer Kumar Shrivastava for petitioner;
G. S. Chauhan, Government Advocate for respondents/State.

ORDER

The present petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking following relief (s) :--

“i) The petition may kindly be allowed with cost: and

ii) The Order of the termination passed on 28.2.2000 (Annexure-P/9) and appellate order dated 30.4.2010 (Annexure-P/14) may kindly be quashed; and

iii) The order of the termination be declared as without jurisdiction, which is pass by res. No.3, and also be declared the appellate order pass by res. No.4 as nonspeaking order as well as without hearing opportunity to the petitioner; and

iv) The direction of the respondents authority be reinstate to the petitioner as on dated of removal, as well as all consequence benefit given as per law which is benefit of the petitioner; and

v) The direction all retire benefit be given to the petitioner; and

vi) Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court may think proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be granted.”

2. Precisely stated facts of the case are that petitioner joined police force in the year 1973 on the post of Sub-Inspector by DIG, Police through Direct Recruitment and he served the department for 27 years. As submitted, he was a sincere and diligent