SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 883

AMIT SETH
Shakuntala (Smt. ) – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Gaurav Mishra for petitioner; K.S. Tomar, Government Advocate for respondents/State; Upendra Yadav for respondent No. 5.

ORDER

1. With the consent of parties, the matter is heard finally.

2. The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 2.2.2021 passed by the Collector, Bhind, whereby, while partly allowing the appeal preferred by the petitioner against the appointment of the respondent No.5 as Aganwadi Worker/Karyakarta, Aganwadi Kendra Mahadevpura Village Enthaar, District Bhind, the matter has been remitted to the Project Officer for the appointment of the most meritorious candidates from the select list. The petitioner also challenges the order dated 13.8.2021 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Chambal Division, Morena whereby, the appeal preferred by the respondent No.5 against the aforesaid order of the Collector has been allowed and the order dated 2.2.2021 has been set aside.

3. Brief facts leading to filing of the instant writ petition are as under:-

3.1 The process for appointment of the Anganwadi Sahaiyka for the Aganwadi Centre in question was initiated vide advertisement dated 21.8.2021. The last date for submission of the application was 5.9.2018. On the basis of the scrutiny of the applications rece

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top