IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Pranay Verma, J.
Bharat Housing Cooperative Society Ltd. v. State of M. P.
Writ Petition No. 3911 of 2024 (I); Decided on 8.12.2025
Nagarpalika (Colony Development) Rules, 2021 (M.P.) -- R. 28 -- M.P. Nagar Palika (Registration of Colonizers, Terms and Conditions) Rules, 1998 -- R. 8(2) -- application for development of colony submitted by petitioner in 2003 under Rules of 1998 by depositing requisite amount -- even after completion of all formalities in 2005, no development work done by petitioner, which was mandatory for purpose of building permission -- respondents not responsible for any delay -- Rules of 1998 repealed by Rules of 2021 -- petitioner cannot insist for adjudication of earlier application under old repealed rules -- respondents committed no error in directing petitioner to file fresh application in accordance with new Rules of 2021 -- any fees or charges deposited earlier shall be adjusted toward fees or charges for processing fresh application. [Paras 14 & 15]
uxjikfydk ¼dky¨uh fodkl½ fu;e] 2021 ¼e-ç-½ & fu- 28 & e-ç- uxjikfydk ¼dkWy¨ukbtj dk jftLVªhdj.k] fucZ/ku rFkk 'krsZ½ fu;e] 1998 & fu- 8¼2½ & ;kph }kjk lu~ 2003 esa lu~ 1998 ds fu;eksa ds v/khu visf{kr jde fuf{kIr dj dkWyksuh ds fodkl ds fy, vkosnu fn;k x;k & o"kZ 2005 esa leLr vkSipkfjdrk,¡ iw.kZ gksus ds i'pkr~ Hkh ;kph }kjk dksbZ fodkl dk;Z ugha fd;k x;k] tks Hkou fuekZ.k dh vuqKk ds Á;kstukFkZ vkKkid Fkk & ÁR;FkhZx.k fdlh foyac ds fy, mÙkjnk;h ugha & lu~ 1998 ds fu;e lu~ 2021 ds fu;eksa }kjk fujflr fd, x, & ;kph fujflr fu;eksa ds v/khu iwoZorhZ vkosnu ds U;k;fu.kZ;u dk vkxzg ugha dj ldrk & ÁR;FkhZx.k us ;kph dks lu~ 2021 ds uohu fu;eksa ds vuqlkj u, fljs ls vkosnu ÁLrqr djus dk funs'k nsdj dksbZ xyrh ugha dh & iwoZ esa fuf{kIr dksbZ 'kqYd ;k ÁHkkj u, vkosnu ij dkjZokbZ djus ds fy, 'kqYd ;k ÁHkkj esa lek;ksftr fd, tk,¡xsA ¼iSjk 14 ,oa 15½
ORDER
1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner praying for the following reliefs :--
“(a) The respondent may be directed to grant building permission to the petitioner society and to quash the communication dated 27.9.2023 (Annexure P/22) and 1.11.2023 (Annexure P/23) after accepting contention of the petitioner society as contained in their communications dated 19.9.2022 (Annexure P/15), 3.1.2023 (Annexure P/16), dated 07.2.2023 (Annexure P/17), 3.3.2023 (Annexure P/18) and 10.4.2023 (Annexure P/19), 13.7.2023 (Annexure P/21) and 1.11.2023 (Annexure P/23) within a specified time.
(b) The petitioner be awarded cost of the petition.
(c) Any other and further relief, as may be deemed fit may be granted to the petitioner.”
2. As per the petitioner it is a cooperative society registered under the provisions of M.P. Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. It is the Bhumiswami of land bearing servey No.5/1/1, 7/1, 9/1, 7/4/1, 8/1 total area 2.902 hectare, Village Goyalakhurd in Tulsi Nagar, Sanver Indore road in District Ujjain. The land had been purchased by it for allotment of plots to its members for which purpose it had obtained a colonizer license from the Collector, District Ujjain on 5.4.1983. The land had been got diverted by the petitioner on 2.4.1985 from the Sub Divisional Officer. In the year 1985 itself development of the land has been done by the petitioner. It had deposited an amount of Rs.15,500/- for sanction of plan and supervision charges to the tune of Rs.15,500/- on 3.3.1989. Thereafter Madhya Pradesh Nagar Palika (Registration of Colonizers) Terms and Conditions Rules, 1998 were framed, hence Colonizer Registration Certificate was also obtained by the petitioner on 6.3.2003.
3. Thereafter the petitioner wanted to develop the entire colony hence submitted application in that regard before the respondents on 12.3.2003. Lay out plan was got sanctioned from the office of Deputy Director, Town and Country Planning, Ujjain on 23.3.2005. Petitioner also deposited supervision fees of Rs.44,000/- on 21.4.2005. Mortgage deed of some plots was also executed by the petitioner in favour of the respondents. The land in question was subject matter of civil dispute which was decided on 20.10.2010 by the Trial Court and was thereafter subject matter of First Appeal No.965/2010 before this Court andthereafter before the spex Court which was finally decided on 4.9.2017 and 19.3.2018 respectively hence further process could not be taken by the respondents.
4. The elected body of the petitioner had been superseded and was under administrative control of the administrator appointed by Co-operative Department. Subsequently elections of the Board of Directors was done by M.P. State Cooperative Tribunal and the elected body was declared on 11.6.2022 and Smt. Kavita Jadhav was elected as the President of the society. On 7.4.2022 administrator of the petitioner society had written a letter to Joint Director, Town and Country Planning Department for renewal of the site plan which was sanctioned earlier on 23.3.2005 but the office of Joint Director informed the petitioner on 29.4.2022 that since development work has already been started upon the land in question, therefore under rule 23 (3) of M.P. Bhumi Vikas Rules, 2012 renewal of the site plan is not necessary.
5. The petitioner submitted a letter on 3.1.2023 to the respondents stating that since application for development has already been submitted on 19.9.2022 in furtherance of application dated 7.2.2023, therefore development permission be issued so that the colony may be fully developed. The same was followed by various reminder letters. Respondent No.2 sent reply to petitioner on 19.4.2023 stating that since petitioners' application was earlier and old it should submit a fresh application. The petitioner replied to the aforesaid letter on 13.7.2023 clarifying that each and every document has already been submitted and applica
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the respondent corporation has the authority to suspend development permission and must provide both parties with an opportunity to present th....
Prior development permissions granted under repealed rules remain valid despite subsequent regulatory changes, and cannot be revoked retroactively by new laws.
The judgment emphasizes the importance of natural justice and interprets the applicability of section 71 of the Gujarat Cooperative Societies Act, highlighting the necessity of previous sanction of t....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and applicability of the provisions of UDCPR 2020, particularly Rule 10.2.10, and the impact of the order dated 19.11.1971 on th....
Court itself is not authorised to approach by way of this petition with no interest of theirs having been left in the property. Moreover, the order of the Collector is based on the lay out plan made ....
Majority consent in cooperative societies is binding for redevelopment under Section 41A of the Gujarat Ownership Flats Act, enabling courts to enforce compliance despite minority objections.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.